Is It Normal Baby 6 Weeks Old Poop Loose Without Seeds

You know about how individuals gain control of the ability of the Land so abuse that power like onetime United states President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush Britain The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley fifteen Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush-league was supported by Uk Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass devastation which did non exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin can save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came about as a effect of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, peculiarly nutrition and sanitation. The event cannot exist owing to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Minor Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

At that place was a nasty illness called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and high-strung them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'due south first park built later rich feared affliction spread from slums United kingdom The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could reach this past ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, The states, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively brusque but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – Baronial 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Mortality- Britain, United states & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the big numbers of deaths caused past the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the Great britain, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the illness dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did non.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the pass up in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [encounter table below].  Leicester's approach also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nihon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.viii
British Regular army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.one
British Army (India)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	xi.i
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.one

Biggs said "In this comparison, I take given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I inquire, if the excessive pocket-sized-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the contrary side."

Tabular array 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Minor-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.l	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	vii,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	five.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	four.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Dr.

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavour to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most nowadays the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a uncomplicated state doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was ofttimes called the speckled monster. In a contempo and popular volume, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year onetime boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came downwardly with a slight fever, just nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, example of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; once more, naught. [1]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin discussion for moo-cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not different the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other archetype stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Simply legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well earlier the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of salubrious people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known every bit variolation. This blazon of inoculation was but a thing of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do meliorate against the affliction than if they contracted information technology at some possibly less desirable fourth dimension and place in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could just be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often assistance protect the private that was inoculated, but there was however an estimated 2-v% that died as a result.[4,5] Notwithstanding, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Only, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation lonely? Or could information technology have had something to practise with the fact that the wealthy had meliorate admission to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of social club?

There was ane major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious affliction and that the do of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later on, and constitute that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to terminate the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation plain tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious illness is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a middle where the affliction should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure information technology was enthusiastically continued by near of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to exist spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amongst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, assertive these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an viii-year-erstwhile boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox every bit a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to back up his contention. While he promoted the utilize of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be allowed to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Physician-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the showtime at that place were problems with Jenner'south process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by beingness inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatever of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[ix]

Vaccination was apace embraced by many in the medical profession as the reply to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner's ideas among numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated past Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the twelvemonth 1799. A month later on information technology was inoculated with small-pox affair without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had moo-cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Infirmary, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. 3 and iv. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The kid of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator'southward proper noun was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south role . . . died of modest-pox a year later on vaccination.[x]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was non living upwards to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[eleven] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is substantially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox earlier vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the nearly skillful practitioners, is at nowadays alarmingly not bad.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, later vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the do.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were amply compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace information technology as a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a medico to have spoken out against it as Dr. Brownish did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could notwithstanding infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could as well be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, i, and, 2 [1820-1822] at that place was a great hubbub about the small-scale-pox. It bankrupt out with the peachy epidemic to the north . . . It pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had minor-pox earlier, and often severely; about to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some alone, but roughshod upon great numbers.[fourteen]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons moo-cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterward, and accept either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine fabric was the "humanized" course, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, simply equally failures increased at that place was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh fabric straight from cows.[xvi]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new affliction.[18] This faulty belief would result in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'south udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later inquiry adamant that this was nothing more than than the old practise of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were also reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a skin condition chosen erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (viii days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 expert cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing diverse epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could exist transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis past means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I practise non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly articulate throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what information technology was promised to exist, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial arrangement intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zippo to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, in that location were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These echo smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more than people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph i: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out confronting the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent medico of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the forcefulness of law created the perfect surround that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 solitary they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will become almost a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper noun, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced and then much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Nevertheless, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French regular army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were 20-three grand four hundred and sixty-nine cases of pocket-size-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine one thousand 3 hundred and 90-ii small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand 8 hundred and fifty-4 had been vaccinated. Seventeen and i-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole land more one hundred and twenty-2 thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from pocket-size-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that betwixt 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from minor-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine prophylactic, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine move. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the cracking demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new regime that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and constructive means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually exist plagued with disaster never did come up to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an middle-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since information technology abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was oftentimes promoted as a safe procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the cease of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed one in five of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in l and later to as low as 1 in 380. The disease could however kill, but having become and then much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The bloodshed was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 commodity in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was effectually 20%, every bit it had been historically. The table also showed that afterwards 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with half dozen% in 1897 to as depression every bit 0.26% by 1908. Equally the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small-scale communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important considering it ofttimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced piddling in the manner of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or fifty-fifty epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection past vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the ramble symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major event, the do of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the final smallpox expiry in the The states in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a peel status due to vaccination, at present beingness termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist betwixt 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of iv to 40%.[35] All the same, they acknowledged that virtually cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this event of vaccination. There were besides an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the consequence of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been ane smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the The states post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military machine father after the father was vaccinated. Afterward a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor claret and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother likewise required handling and virus was constitute all over the business firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even higher. This report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the Usa. If the deaths were this loftier in a state with a modern health-intendance organisation, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire globe?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and maybe afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. We adopt to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted fashion to deal with illness, at that place were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food product that is made through fermentation of a diverseness of sources. An 1877 commodity described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, Thousand.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the utilise of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth commencement claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable equally a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in blood-red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, later on breakfast and at evening, for xiv days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while amid those under ordinary handling the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used 3 or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Lodge, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front end in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fearfulness of smallpox if he will have two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or iv times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but only considering most people have been conditioned to accept the historic period-one-time prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human being arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or merely an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and claret vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the torso is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a upshot, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of Rex's Higher, described the poor diet of gilded miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, java, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living near entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour fabricated into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is done downward with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men beingness at the aforementioned time subjected to the about intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at to the lowest degree ii-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the adjacent common cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a pocket-sized fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for one pct of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as cherry fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping coughing (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & vi).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half dozen: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the truthful history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche equally something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease thing into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is nil close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and accept since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, practise more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Scientific discipline the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, Dr., Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.Five. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
v.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Nippon, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Example Confronting Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brownish, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations past Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Doc-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Study on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United states of america," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Written report of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, Feb 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Scout, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, Doc, "A Physician's Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June one, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Affliction," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Three, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufacturing plant Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Dr. and Howard A. Joos Physician, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Germ-free Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January fifteen, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Male monarch'south Higher," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Rubber, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Rubber, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

taylorwharld.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post